Disk Detective Talk
Semireg PV, likely M giant
insufficient excess for M type star by color
M giant M7III sptype
eclipsing binary variable, good excess ~2.7, low PM
low PM but good excess
low PM, good excess M type star by color
repeat
low PM, good excess
el repeato
good excess, low PM, to be vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
QSO/AGN
vetted to round 3, good excess low PM
excess not impressive but ok PM, may be worth a look as a possible M dwarf
insufficient excess
low PM, ok excess ~ 1.7
long period variable with barely enough excess for type, most likely M giant
SR+L variable -> M giant
low PM, Vamp ~ 1, excess ~ 1.9, LC suggests M giant
M type by color, insufficient excess
unfortunately no excess at W1-W3 so extension ruins it, good PM though ~ 300pc distant
K-type supergiant, interesting but not to us
not great PM but some excess there ~ 1.8, images look clean to me, worth a look
Decent PM for type, excess ~ 1.3, worth vetting to Rd3
likely AGN/QSO
M type star by color with insufficient excess
Good candidate, vetted to Round 3
AGN/QSO most likely
low PM, unimpressive excess
LC suggests giant, barely sufficient excess
low PM, M type by color, excess ~ 1.5, not much to look at
#galaxy , #agn?
excess ~ 2.2 with Halpha emission, possibly a distant faint YSO, YSOc III in Marton+, low PM, to be vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
YSOc with Ha emission, pretty faint
barely sufficient excess for type and a little extended at W4
late type star with not a whole lot going for it, low PM, W1-W4=1.3
Type III Marton+ YSOc but very faint Rmag 19.260
now added to Be star spreadsheet
#galaxy or #agn
multiple unfortunately, clearly seen in SDSS9 color plates
#Galaxy / #AGN
#multiple
needs vetting to Faint M /YSO sheet
low PM variable late type star
low PM M type star by color with OK excess
likely a #QSO / #AGN
M type star by color with low PM and barely sufficient excess
LPV late type star, likely giant
Ha emission but little excess for M type star by color
low PM, barely enough excess for type
#galaxy
nothing impressive far as excess and PM go, plus extended
low Pm late type star with little excess, not much to see
AGN/QSO looking, multiple as well by the looks of it
Classic YSO SED, Class I/II YSOc in Marton+, low PM, to be vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
To be vetted to Round 3 sheet
A2 IV early type star with 12/22um excess, Class III YSOc (Marton+), decent PMS, GAIA plx 2.04, GALEX UV emission. likely YSO
unimpressive PM and excess, YSOc
listed as LSP variable, Vamp 0.87, good excess but low PM. not sure about this one..
late type variable star
nice bump there at 12+22um, ok PM for late type star, Marton+ YSOc
SR variable, giant
late type star, low PM, unimpressive excess
LPV, a likely giant
pretty low excess, low PM, late type, not much worth following up
semireg PV with Vamp 2.18, #giant
low PM, ok excess, late type star
Semi-reg PV
too little excess for M type star by color
SR+L variable, giant
Late type star with OK IRX, low PM
Classic SED YSO, Marton+ I/II YSOc, needs vetting to Faint M/YSO sheet
Late type star with large 3.2 Vamp - likely giant
To be vetted to Rd3
K2/3 by color, good excess, slightly elongated in DSS2 images, might be a blend, decent PM, Marton+ I/II YSOc
known YSO+dust, Spitzer observed
late type star with ok excess, worth looking at
decent chance of being an AGN, with the other problems, not worth picking out
classic YSO shape SED, Marton+ class I/II YSOc, Ha emission, now being vetted to FaintM/YSO sheet
little excess and extended
YSOc with good excess
low PM and unimpressive IRE
Rapid Variable but also insufficient excess for M type star by color
Ha emission but with little excess above requirements for M type star by color
barely enough excess for M type star, nothing exceptional here
low PM and Vamp ~ 0.7, likely M giant
insufficient excess for M type star
marginal excess for type
well.. either a quasar or a galaxy, or both
good excess
barely sufficient excess for M type by color, low PM, likely an M giant, not of interest
that is some serious dropping out there.
late type star with good excess and Ha emission, YSOc
SR+L variable, insufficient excess, M giant
not round, likely #blend
barely sufficient excess for M type star by color, not of interest
early type A0 star with 22um excess, but unfortuately very extended at W4
looks like a #blend?
Barely sufficient excess for an M type star by color
Marton+ YSOc with decent excess
definitely worth a further look seems not round in DSS2 images?
interesting object, Edelson SI makes it unlikely to be AGN, Marton+ YSOc but also symbiotic star candidate possible AGB type
good excess worth vetting to faint YSO/M dwarf
actually a triple system it seems, rho1=~2arcsec, rho2=~28arcsec, not a great candidate due to sep and extension
some debate about classification, SDDS says galaxy, most recent says star; however good excess (~2.2) for type, possible unidentified YSOc
M giant from Pickles+, excess and PM seem to agree
clear YSO SED, Class I/II YSOc Marton+, some possible contamination from nearby star but a good candidate, needs vet to Faint YSO/M dwarf
VizieR data suggests possible AGN, Edelson+ SI=0.687, W1-W2 > 0.8; but also GALEX UV source; YSO not out of question; possible multiple?
quite a lot of excess here though ~ 2.2, unusual for an M giant
G-type star, unfortunately also a multiple
I'd go with #agn on this one as it's classified as stellar source in all catalogs, probably a new #AGNc
an unremarkable late type star with little excess and low PM
Large error bars but very good excess, class I/II YSO in Marton+; possible faint bg objects
an interestingly shaped #galaxy
already studied for transitional disk
#AGN
insufficient IRE
most likely a galaxy by SED and VizieR data
This seems to be a K giant with considerable excess, something we're definitely interested in; not sure if a bg galaxy may be involved
L variable, likely giant
agreed on #debrisdiskc
insufficient IRE for M type star by color
late type star with unimpressive PM that barely meets excess requirement
SR+L variable, likely giant
vetted to Faint M/YSO
Vetted to Rd3, known debris disk
vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
now vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
Now vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
insufficient IRE for M type star
HPM star, vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
Vetted to Faint M / YSO sheet
Vetted to Faint M/YSO spreadsheet
Now vetted to Rd3
M type star by color with insufficient IRE
looks like M star based on color to me and insufficient IRE for that type
SED suggests YSO; YSOc in Marton+2016; H-alpha emission, great excess; good candidate to be vetted to Faint YSO sheet Vmag 15.95
YSOc, SED suggests same, good candidate to look at, to be vetted to Rd3
insufficient IR excess for late type star
nice clean A2V early type star with excess, a good candidate, to be vetted to Rd3
MISC variable 0.5 Vamp with ~2.4 IRE, possible YSO?
LB variable -> giant?
Marton+2016 YSOc
Marton+2016 YSOc, good excess for type
Semireg PV
insufficient excess for M type star (by color)
SR+L variable, low PM, likely M giant
Be star
M type (by color) MISC variable with insufficient IRE
High PM star with large excess, possible M dwarf with disk
Marton+2016 YSOc, good excess
also looks like a W1 dropout though w1sat is small
insufficient IRE for M type star (by color)
late type star, excess unspectacular but good PM, possible M dwarf
late type star with large excess for type and H-alpha emission
#galaxy by SED
early type star with 22um excess but extended and likely contaminated
M by color, barely enough excess and SR variable, likely giant
Large excess at 12 and 22um, fitted sptype M3V (Pickles+2010) with dist 27pc, very good candidate possible M dwarf with disk
decent PM for type
Mira Ceti type variable with large Vamp, likely M giant
Marton+2016 YSOc, ok excess for type
MISC #variable M type star by color, with insufficient IRE
#blend #multiple
A0 spectral type, 22um excess, YSOc in Marton+2016, plx 1.66, vetting to Rd3
#QSO / #AGN by SED, #noao
Marton+2016 YSOc, late type star by color
YSOc in Marton+2016, probable member of Alessi 12 Open Cluster, good excess, late type by color
insufficient IRE for M class star (by color)
M giant SR+L #variable
MISC #variable with Vamp=0.8 and unimpressive PM
SED seems to suggest #galaxy yet it looks point-like in Aladin and UCAC4 says star though excess seems very large
Recently confirmed Be star
W1 dropout, W1sat=0.980
W1 dropout, W1sat=0.662
w1 dropout, w1sat=0.7
#multiple in DSS2Red+IR
I'll put my money on planetary nebula for this one, though all records indicate star - maybe new PN?
hardly sufficient excess for late type star + on-edge multiple = no
W1 dropout. bad candidate. bad. next.
that's uh.. an interesting error bar you've got there mr 2MASS K band; also good excess for late type star; PM low but worth a look
Variable star, Vamp~0.4, low PM -> likely #giant
low PM late type star with no spectacular excess - likely #giant
#multiple in IRSA at 9 o'clock
Mira Ceti variable candidate and also W1 dropout W1sat 0.174
Late type star, low PM but ok excess, worth a second look
nice bright B8V HD star with excess, off to Rd3 with you
YSO acc to Simbad, SED is pretty wild, v large W1-W4 excess ~ 7.5; B9e sp type, but D quality so could possible be an A0e? To rd3 it goes
Be star, Be star burning bright, In the forests of the night; What immortal hand or eye, Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.7
Variable star in the Sagittarius Dwarf with Vamp ~ 2, likely a #giant
insufficient excess for late type star
YSOc in Marton+2016
Mira Ceti #variable
insufficient IRE for late type star ~ 0.5
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.6
#repeat
#giant
late type star with insufficient IRE ~ 0.8
pretty low PM late type star, excess ok but not spectacular, worth a lookover I guess
low PM MISC Variable with 0.43 Vamp so likely #giant
late type star with good excess
mid-type star with good excess, G5V in Pickles+2010, vetting to Rd3
MISC Variable late type star Vamp ~ 0.5, low PM likely #giant
late type star with insufficient IRE ~ 0.4
late type star with good excess ~ 2.4
late type star with insufficient IRE ~0.7
#TTauri binary, a very nice example of protoplanetary disk, but very well studied already, may be worth vetting to check the refs in detail
large error bar on W1 with W1sat=0.174, but good excess for type ~ 2.1 and decent PM, worth a look
not of interest to us, but interesting in itself, one of two examples of potential "iron stars" known so far
looks contaminated to me
barely meets the 0.9 IRE threshold so I dont think it is worth bothering with
SED suggests YSO, YSOc in Marton+2016, vetting to rd3, possible on-edge multiples, needs checking
V* GO Tau - T Tauri YSO + known disk, extraordinarily well studied with 100+ references
MISC Variable with Vamp ~ 0.9 + insufficient excess for late type star; probable M #giant
insufficient IRE for late type star ~ 0.7
red clump stars are still #giants, also SR+L variable so no good
SRB #variable M #giant
#agb star
insufficient IRE for late type star
#extended at W4
Unfortunately a prominent on-circle multiple that looks to be contaminating the situation
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.8
looks like a multiple with a bkg #galaxy at 1.5 arcsec distance according to SDDS records; shame it's listed as VB8M7V sp type Pickles+
Low pm late type star with relatively low excess ~ 1.2 and Vamp ~ 0.6, likely and M #giant
unfortunately dont think there's any way to weed out the excess from the different components on this one - sep is 2.5 not great + nebula
well this is certainly an interesting one - a binary T Tauri YSO in a nebula from the looks of it - IR excess seems to support it
SED indicates #YSO, YSOc in Marton+2016, large excess, late type by color, looks a bit suspicious in DSS2 images, possible multiple, vet Rd3
late type with marginal excess, not much to look at
classic #YSO shape SED, new YSOc, no refs, cirrus contam at W3+W4 otherwise clean, v large excess, Vmag 16.8, vetting to Faint obj sheet
beautiful classic YSO shape SED w/ v lg excess, YSOc in Marton+2016, no refs, clean images Vmag ~ 11.9, sp type K2 by color, vetting to Rd3
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.5
nice one, known M2 class YSO + disk, extensively studied unfortunately
M7III in Pickles, low pm, we'll leave it at that
insufficient excess ~ 0.8 and Vamp = 0.8 -> #giant
insufficient excess for late type star W1-W4~0.8
insufficient excess for late type star W1-W4~0.6
#Quasar
Late type star, YSOc in Marton+2016, good excess for type, Vmag=15.89, vetting to faint YSO/M dwarf
YSOc in Marton+ 2016, seems worth a look, though very faint
SED suggests YSO, YSOc in Marton+2016, Vmag 12.56, F0II fitted spectral type in Pickles+2010, vetting to Rd3
MISC Variable Late Type Star with insufficient excess for type W1-W4~0.8
SR+L variable late type star
#blend
Late type star with insufficient IR excess W1-W4~0.5
MISC/SR Variable with insufficient excess for late type star
SED suggests YSO, YSOc in Marton+2016, contamination or artifact at DSS2 IR, on-circle multiple 8 o'clock, Vmag 13.689, vetting to Rd3
strange one, SED suggests YSO, large excess and YSOc in Marton+2016, however also Semi-Reg Pulsating Variable which says #giant?
SED indicates YSO, YSOc in Marton+ 2016, good excess, clean images, late type star by color, vetting to Rd3
MISC Variable late type star with good PM, good excess, low-ish Vamp (0.4), Vmag 11.9
Mira Ceti Variable late type star
low PM but excess above requirements for late type star so worth a look I guess
SED c/w YSO, unlisted, likely new YSOc, low PM but large excess, Vmag 14.939, seems like a very #goodcandidate, clean imgs, vetting to Rd3
MISC Variable late type star with insufficient excess for type (~0.6)
insufficient excess, late type star, low PM, very distant, nothing to see here, move along 😄
late type MISC variable with 0.9 Vamp, likely M #giant
#early type star, known IRE, good excess (0.5), not studied for disk, may be problematic on-circle multiple 5 o'clock, extended @ W4 vet Rd3
not 100% certain but IRSA images suggest a #blend and/or #multiple 1 o'clock and 4 o'clock
SED c/w YSO, YSOc in Marton+ 2016, good excess, vetting to Rd3
SED cw YSO, No Vmag, YSOc in Marton+ 2016, large excess, images clean, but faint, vetting to Faint M dwarf + YSO list
insufficient IR excess for type W1-W4 ~ 0.5
late type star with insufficient IR excess W1-W4 ~ 0.4
also insufficient excess for type W1-W4 ~ 0.4
missing DSS2 and 2MASS images
Semi Regular Pulsating Variable late type star (Richards+, 2012), with un-spectacular excess for type (~1.1); LC suggests #giant
excess also very barely in range for late type star - 0.905, likely not worth following up
low PM and no spectacular excessfor late type star (1.1)
Semi-reg pulsating late-type #variable with insufficient excess - #giant
YSOc in Marton+,2016; late type star by SED, Vmag=15.03
late type star, excess only 1.1, Variable with Vamp 0.41, PM not horrible but not spectacular either not much to look at here
disturbingly small error bars 😄
SED c/w YSO, images clean, #noao, Vmag 17.9 so possibly too faint, large excess, YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), #goodcandidate vetting to Rd3
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.4
Semi-regular pulsating Star, Vamp 1.29, LC characteristic of late type #giant
#goodcandidate fitted Pickles spectral type M3V, SED indicates YSO with large excess, hell of a dist est though - 14062pc 😄 vetted to Rd3
Haro 5-97 - SED indicates YSO, YSOc in Marton, 2016, v good excess + H-alpha emission, images clean, vetting to Rd3 #goodcandidate
too little excess for late type star ~0.4
Mira Variable candidate + classed as probable double star in UCAC4, unknown sep
Mira Ceti Variable star
late type, YSOc in (Marton+, 2016)
DDOI in main
#early type star, sp type A2/F0III, good excess, YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), images clean, vetting to Rd3
possible W1 dropout as well
MISC Variable with huge Vamp=3 low PM #giant
also W1 #dropout
late type + low PM + low-ish excess (~1.1) + MISC variable with 0.7 Vamp = probable #giant
W1-W4 only ~0.2 so too little excess for type
Double star fit according to UCAC4, DSS2 IRSA images seems to agree, definite blend - sep unknown unfortunately, looks small
SR+L Variable and seems like it's also a W1 #dropout
the on-circle multiple isn't hugely problematic to me, but the W1 dropout is. too bad,had a nice ~2.9 IR excess, very good for its type
moves off crosshairs completely in 2MASS images unfortunately
low PM, but good excess for type, worth a gander
on-circle #multiple 6 o'clock and nothing spectacular going for this one
large error bar on W1 with possible dropout (w1sat=0.12) however large excess for type (~3.1), worth vetting for second opinion
late type (double? UCAC4) star with insufficient excess (~0.5) for type
YSOc with v large excess, some shifting, a little extended at W4 possible contamination, worth a closer look though
SED show clear W1 #dropout unfortunately on this one, W1sat~0.2
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), not round in first image, possible #blend though no clear evidence in IRSA, vetting to Rd3
very interesting SED, listed as both AGNc and YSOc, but Spitzer observed and classified as star+dust; large excess, vetting to Rd3
SR+L Variable Star, likely #giant
insufficient excess for late type star , W1-W4 only ~0.3
IRSA Finder DSS2 images suggest #blend + #multiple
clear #multiple in DSS2 IR IRSA image
SED suggests new #YSO, also #YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) but likely too faint, vetting to Rd3 anyway as interesting
Agree W1 dropout
#giant in (Gigoyan+ 2012)
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016)
excess just under the required for late type stars ~0.85 so probably not worth bothering with as there's nothing else of note on this one
#YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) but #contaminated by nearby star
#carbon #star
SED indicates YSO, already a DDOI in Main Vetting List
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), vetting to Rd3
#noao no Vmag, but good excess ~2 and decent PM for type, may be too faint but vetting to Rd3 for final call
SRB variable M #giant also with insufficient excess for type
#AGB candidate
likely M giant, with insufficient excess ~ 0.6
unfortunately IRSA 2MASS indicates #multiple at 10 o'clock
semi-regular PV star
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) good excess
late type star, nothing special but no major problems either, vetting to rd3
listed as star in several catalogs but SED leans towards #QSO/#AGN
insufficient excess for late type star w1-w4~0.4
#multiple in IRSA Finder
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) with good excess though possibly too faint
SRB Variable giant
SED suggests new YSO with large excess however it's likely too faint with Vmag 18.19. Vetting to rd3
Seyfert #galaxy / #agn
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) with good excess, worth a look
hmm listed as both AGNc and YSOc, but this is either a merge or there's definitely another object at 5 o'clock in there.shame, huge excess
too little excess for late type star w1-w4~0.5
too little excess for late type star W1-W4~0.7
too little excess for type, W1-W4~0.87, also low PM not likely worth following up
w1-w4~0.6, too little excess for type
YSOc but likely too faint, vetted to rd3
YSOc but unfortunately a clear multiple as well
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), may be too faint though, vetting for good measure
too little excess for type and very faint w1-w4~0.6
Fairly large extension at WISE4 though. Also a double star with sep 16.3arcsec
something's clearly dodgy with this one, 2MASS IRSA images seem to suggest either a blend or a non-star object
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) but likely too faint, vetting to round 3 for good measure
judging by shape and images this is a #blend but also multiple at 4-5 o'clock in IRSA finder so sadly its a dud
SRB Variable - #giant
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), good excess, vetting to round three
insufficient IRE for type
looks like same position across all WISE bands to me so I'd say not shifting
decent PM and good excess for type, vetting to third round
Be star, sent to John
agree with #multiple visible in IRSA Finder at 5 o'clock
too little excess for type w1-w4~0.7
W1-W4~0.6 which is too little for M type by color #noire
LC Vamp ~2.0 suggests M giant, #noAO no Vmag
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), worth a look
also #IRE with w1-w4~0.4
#multiple in IRSA Finder SDSS images at 3 o'clock
on-circle #multiple at 4 o'clock
W1sat > 0.2 I'd say dropout on this one not worth pursuing
#YSO but unfortunately shows a #multiple at DSS2 Red+IR at 10 o'clock
at least one other faint bg object so #multiple
W1 dropout and likely multiple
too little excess for type W1-W4 ~ 0.7, very faint
#AGN candidate but SED suggests #YSO. SI in Edelson+2012 is 0.78, leaning towards not-AGN but can't be sure - huge excess tho
very good excess for type and Halpha emission, but then the LC is more giant than anything else. worth looking at close at least I guess
too little excess for type
I'd incline more towards #YSO on this one, also has a high Si in Edelson 2012+ so unlikely to be an AGN.
no Vmag, interesting but unlikely to be in the category of objects of interest to us
on Main vetting list
both IRSA Finder and VizieR records suggest #multiple at around 1arcsec at 12 oclock
going to chuck this as an M giant, barely crosses the 0.9 threshold, PM is low-ish with huge error margins, very faint, not worth following
not 100% sure but looks like #multiple faint background objects within circle
strange case this one. GSC3.2/PPMXL/IGSL indicate two sources with radically different PMs not sure if measuring error, leaving this for now
Vamp=1.42 and low PM, I think we can safely guess this to be an M giant
excess is ok, but WISE record and SED suggest W1 dropout with W1sat=0.158. also low PM M class star so not really a great candidate,skipping
well poop, almost done vetting this when multiple rears its ugly head on IRSA finder. roughly at 3:30 o'clock can't miss it #multiple sadly
vetted to Round3
#multiple at 12 o'clock
#late-type star with #I-R-E W1-W4=0.47
#AGB star 2MASS J18193573+1839173 -- Asymptotic Giant Branch Star (He-burning)
likely dropout with W1sat 0.112
IRSA images also suggest #multiple on this one
based on IRSA I would say no on multiple but not 100%
W1 dropout
#AGN / #QSO + #Galaxy
nicely squiggly though 😄
#blend + W1-W4=0.7
likely giant by low PM
looks like #AGN / #QSO
Unfortunately a clear #multiple from the IRSA Finder images
M5.5 Giant (Gigoyan+ 2012)
Vamp=0.8 low PM likely giant
likely #giant
most likely #AGN unfortunately according to Si = 1.347 in (Edelson+, 2012)
insufficient excess W1-W4=0.4
likely #blend
SED suggests AGN and is a candidate in (Edelson+, 2012)
Be star plus likely W1 dropout
likely W1 dropout, W1sat=0.155
decent excess but low PM, likely a giant
SED suggests #plantetary #nebula though there are no records to confirm it
low pm, excess < 0.9 likely giant
W1-W4~0.5 so not enough excess
Class M9III (Pickles+,2010) #giant
#blazar
distance = 4800 parsecs, M giant
#pn #planetary-nebula
possible #multiple at 5'oclock
carbon star, extremely well studied
high Vamp 1.1, low PM, likely a #giant
would say #agn by SED
likely #blend judging by visual
likely W1 #dropout w1sat=-.169
Unfortunately #contaminated by secondary source, 4.4arcsec away, both listed as YSOs, but no good
var LC suggests #giant
likely M giant
#mira variable
probable #giant w1-w4=0.95 and low pm
low excess for type W1-W4=0.8 and possible W1 dropout
#AGN #QSO
high errors margins on PM, decent excess (~1.5) but #multiple
likely #AGN #QSO , only classified as non-star in VizieR
W1-W4=0.3, too little excess
likely an #AGN it is an AGN candidate in Vizier
#quasar #QSO
Vamp = 1.3 likely M giant
low pm, likely an M giant
too little excess for type W1-W4=~0.5
late-type, low PM, likely an M giant
Seyfert 1 #Galaxy
#QSO #quasar
#galaxy in VizieR, but SED seems to match a new #AGN / #QSO
#yso
possible multiple + contamination at W4
looks like a likely #blend
slightly off-center and a little bit extended in W4 but may be worth a look still
SED suggests #galaxy on this one but no records in VizieR to confirm it as such
also #contaminated in IRSA WISE
Agree
SED typical for early-type star; HD 131686 -- #Star in #SIMBAD spectral type A0IV/V; heavily #contaminated at WISE 4
Added to Round Three, though may be too faint
#galaxy #extended at WISE4 #noAO SDSS J143112.97+063159.8
Agree #noAO
Confirmed #multiple in IRSA images
Agree #noAO possible faint #multiple as well
#multiple #extende #noAO
#extended at W4, #noAO
#multiple #extended
#multiple #extended OGLE BLG-LPV 127718 -- #Semi-regular #pulsating #Star in #SIMBAD
likely faint #multiple, definitely #contaminated #noAO
Agree #multiple
#multiple #noAO
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
SED suggests possible #YSO however it is listed in (Edelson+, 2012) as an #AGN candidate, WISE data indicates high variability at W1+2
#multiple #blend #noAO
SED suggest possible #YSO, but #multiple #blend and heavily #contaminated by nearby source in W3+4
#multiple possible #blend #noAO
#multiple #blend #extended at W4 #noAO
SED suggest #late-type #star, also by color, W1-W4~2, but has low pm and no CSDR2 data so assuming an M giant
Agree probable #QSO (Flesch, 2010)
heavily #extended and #contaminated in W3+4, SED suggests #YSO with #Halpha emission in (Barentsen+, 2014)
#multiple #blend #extended #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
Vamp ~ 0.7 with low pm seems to indicate M giant
likely B giant, already on DD vetting list
#multiple #blend #contaminated #noAO
#multiple #star IRAS 19316+2544 in #SIMBAD
Agree #multiple #extended in W4 #contaminated in IRSA WISE 3/4
Agree faint #multiple
#multiple probable #blend #noAO
Agree also #extended in W4 and #contaminated
on-edge #multiple, possibly others fainter in bg, #late-type #star by color, low PM, no Vamp data
possible #multiple faint and #extended at W4 #noAO
TYC 471-222-1 #star spectral type K2III, but unfortunately heavily #contaminated in W3 and W4 by nearby object
Agree on #multiple/#blend
Confirmed #galaxy J095859.72+212044.6
Agree #multiple faint obj and #extended
faint #multiple #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO #spitzer observed object in #MIPSGAL
#multiple CGCS 4770 -- #carbon #star in #SIMBAD
possibly #contaminated by nearby source, unclear in IRSA but definite faint #multiple objects in circle; #noAO
Agree + drop at W1 though W1sat=0
Agree, probable M giant by low pm, not an object of interest
#multiple #contaminated #noAO
#multiple #blend with background source - can be clearly seen in IRSA
#multiple IRAS 17349-3722 #infrared source in #SIMBAD
one hell of a #blend there #multiple #noAO
likely faint #multiple #noAO
Added to third round DDOI
Not an object of interest for observation currently
possible #YSO by SED but probable faint #multiple objects in bg and heavily contaminated in WISE 3+4, confirmed in IRSA WISE images #noAO
likely #multiple faint objects #noAO
#multiple probable #blend possibly #contaminated in WISE4 #noAO
Agree likely #blend
#multiple CGCS 2479 #carbon #star in #SIMBAD
#multiple faint objects #noAO seems extended possibly #contaminated by nearby source
#double #star too bad for the shift, would be a good candidate
IRSA images confirm #contaminated
likely #blend but also dropout at W1, sat1=0.144
Agree also #faint multiple objects present
#multiple faint on-circle objects
#multiple #extended OGLE BLG-LPV 32809 Semi-regular #pulsating #star in #SIMBAD
late type #star by SED, #noAO, possible on-circle faint #multiple, Vmag 16.340, low PM, likely M giant
Agree + #multiple #noAO
#multiple faint objects #noAO
Agree also probable #multiple in DSS2 images
#multiple #extended #contaminated #variable semi-regular #pulsating #star OGLE BLG-LPV 8305 in #SIMBAD
#multiple faint objects #extended in WISE4, #noAO
#YSO candidate in #SIMBAD but unfortunately obvious #multiple in DSS2
#extended in WISE4, W1-W4=0.424 #noexcess #noAO
Agree #multiple #blend
probable M giant, with low PM, but added to Round Three due to significant W1-W4 excess and Vamp<1
Agree, M-type #star in LAMOST DR1 (Luo+, 2015)
faint #multiple objects at 1 and 5 o'clock, SED indicates late-type #star, W1-W4=0.559 #noexcess; #Halpha emission in (Barentsen+, 2014)
Agree #multiple #noAO
most likely #multiple in DSS2 Red+IR at 4 o'clock, likely #contaminated in W4
#multiple #infrared source in #SIMBAD IRAS 19030+1645
Agree, interesting drop on SED at W3
clear #blend at 12 o'clock in DSS2/2MASS IRSA images #vista #variable #star (Minniti+, 2014) #noAO
#multiple #star IRAS 17280-2229 in #SIMBAD
probable #blend #extended #contaminated
Agree #extended #noAO
Agree #contaminated
late-type #star by SED but unfortunately #contaminated in WISE4
Possible faint multiple are prob. imaging artifacts, so I still consider this a #goodcandidate though other params may not make it a DDOI
Believe initial report on PM to be erroneus, URAT(Zacharias+ 2015) seems to give it 6.9/14.3 so not very high.
#multiple #noAO probable late-type #star #halpha source in (Barentsen+, 2014)
#extended field #contaminated in IRSA images possible #multiple #noAO
Agree #multiple faint obj
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO SED suggests late-type star
Confirm #galaxy SDSS J154049.20+383614.7 also in #galaxyzoo1 and 2 catalogues
Agree, confirmed galaxy SDSS J222037.45+055158.2
#multiple #extended late-type #star #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO SED suggests late-type star confirmed by color
#multiple faint bg objects #noAO SED suggests late-type #star
#multiple #star #simbad IRAS 18254+0657
Agree, unfortunately no good due to excessive contamination in WISE
Agree; W4-W1=0.563, probably no excess
#multiple #extended #infrared source IRAS 18497-0057 in #simbad
likely #contaminated in WISE4 visible in IRSA
#extended in WISE4 #noAO SED typical of late-type #star; little info in VizieR
late-type #star probable #multiple on circle and other faint objects #noAO
known #quasar #QSO 2MASS J01572105+1712484 #simbad
late-type #star by color; #Halpha emission; possible #multiple at 12 o'clock on circle; added to Third Round
#multiple probably #contaminated, #noAO, SED indicates late-type #star
SED indicates late-type star; #multiple faint objects in bg, #noAO; #spitzer obseved object in #GLIMPSE
Agree although pm in UCAC is only -17.3/26.9 so not that high
#multiple faint objects, #extended in WISE4, #noAO
Agree #blend
Agree, SED suggest #QSO / #AGN seems to be an unknown for now
faint #multiple in DSS2 #noAO
#noAO SED suggests YSO but intensely #contaminated in all WISE frames
#multiple slightly #extended in WISE4 #noAO
IRSA images do not suggest blend, though DSS2 Blue image missing, also #spitzer observed in #GLIMPSE no Vmag very little info in VizieR
#extended in WISE4, SED suggests #galaxy confirmed SDSS J113600.10+554858.7
Agreed also #contaminated in WISE1+2 visible on IRSA
Agree, highly #contaminated
#multiple #extended likely #contaminated #noAO
Agree #multiple slightly #extended in WISE4
likely #contaminated from IRSA images
#multiple #blend #star IRAS 19192+0509 in #simbad
late type #star by color, #noAO, slightly #extended in WISE4 but no sign of contamination in IRSA, W4-W1=0.660, J8.514 H7.296 K6.785
possible faint #multiple at 8 o'clock #noAO
#multiple possibly #blended #star in #simbad
#multiple possible #blend #noAO #spitzer observed object in GLIMPSE/MIPSGAL J11.489 H9.041 K7.807, no Vmag
#multiple #Simbad Semi-regular #pulsating #star #contaminated
#multiple on-edge late-type #star #noAO
#noAO #multiple #interesting listed as 2nd component of #double #star in (Zacharias+, 2012)
known #AGN candidate from (Kouzuma+, 2010) (Brescia+, 2015), high #redshift
late-type #star J9.480 H8.285 K7.778 (Cutri+ 2012) Vmag 17.420 (Zacharias+ 2005)
possible faint #multiple, slightly #extended WISE4, maybe #goodcandidate
looks like late type #star J9.971 H8.747 K8.105 (Cutri+ 2013) Vmag 16.560 (Zacharias+ 2005) possible on-edge #multiple in DSS2 RED+IR
#VISTA #variable #star #spitzer observed object in MIPSGAL/GLIMPSE
#VISTA #variable #star
Confirmed #starburst #galaxy SDSS J104347.85+181158.3
Confirmed #multiple and #extended in WISE4
looks somewhat #extended in WISE4 as well
#multiple #extended possibly #contaminated in WISE4
#multiple #extended #noAO #star J9.894 H8.846 K8.471, Vmag 14.91 (Girard+, 2011)
#multiple #extended #spitzer observed GLIMPSE 1
#multiple late type #star #noAO J7.815 H6.700 K6.180 (Cutri+ 2012) , Vmag 16.13 (Girard+, 2011)
#multiple #extended #noAO #star #noexcess W1-W4=0.361
#multiple #extended in WISE4
#multiple faint sources, #extended in WISE4, J12.240 H9.894 K8.703 (Cutri+ 2012) #spitzer object possible #VISTAvariable #noAO
#multiple #extended late type #star WISE W1-W4=0.518 so may have #noexcess
definite on-edge #multiple, #noAO late type #star in VizieR J9.345 H8.326 K8.014 V13.641
#multiple #variable #star in #simbad J17512422-3337521 probably #contaminated
#multiple faint bg sources, extended in WISE3+4, probable contamination
#multiple faint objects in background
#multiple #nosimbad
#multiple #extended #variable #star VVV J170343.57-414230.91 in (Minniti+, 2014) #nosimbad
Late type star, possible faint #multiple, extended in WISE4, #nosimbad, J9.745 K8.727 B15.550 V13.621 UCAC4 (Zacharias+, 2012)
#multiple #extended #nosimbad
#multiple #interesting bump at 12 microns #nosimbad
#multiple ?
#multiple #extended /nosimbad #star VizieR (Lucas+ 2012)
#multiple faint objects also #extended #nosimbad
#multiple probable #star (STScI, 2006) (Lucas+ 2012) #nosimbad
not sure this is a #multiple
#multiple maybe #extended possible #variable #star VVV J162354.08-494817.46 in (Minniti+, 2014)
#extended #contaminated #nosimbad
#multiple #extended #contaminated
#extended #contaminated
no data in DSS2, seems extended in WISE #nosimbad probable #variable #star (Minniti+, 2014)
#multiple #contaminated
possibly #multiple, #extended #contaminated #nosimbad
#multiple #variable #star
#multiple #contaminated #extended #nosimbad
#extended in WISE4, possible #multiple #Simbad normal #star J 9.23 K 8.497
#nosimbad #multiple #extended
#multiple #Simbad Semi-regular pulsating Star J 8.304 K 6.998
#multiple #variable #star (Minniti+, 2014)
#extended #nosimbad
#extended #galaxy #nosimbad
#goodcandidate #star possible #yso (?) Jmag 8.279 Kmag 6.395
possibly SDSS J133927.83+652151.6 ? #galaxy
#extended
#extended #multiple #nosimbad
#extended #offcrosshair #nosimbad
#Extended #NoSimbad
Semireg PV, likely M giant
insufficient excess for M type star by color
M giant M7III sptype
insufficient excess for M type star by color
eclipsing binary variable, good excess ~2.7, low PM
low PM but good excess
insufficient excess for M type star by color
low PM, good excess M type star by color
repeat
low PM, good excess
el repeato
insufficient excess for M type star by color
good excess, low PM, to be vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
QSO/AGN
vetted to round 3, good excess low PM
excess not impressive but ok PM, may be worth a look as a possible M dwarf
insufficient excess
low PM, ok excess ~ 1.7
long period variable with barely enough excess for type, most likely M giant
SR+L variable -> M giant
low PM, Vamp ~ 1, excess ~ 1.9, LC suggests M giant
M type by color, insufficient excess
unfortunately no excess at W1-W3 so extension ruins it, good PM though ~ 300pc distant
K-type supergiant, interesting but not to us
not great PM but some excess there ~ 1.8, images look clean to me, worth a look
insufficient excess for M type star by color
Decent PM for type, excess ~ 1.3, worth vetting to Rd3
likely AGN/QSO
M type star by color with insufficient excess
Good candidate, vetted to Round 3
AGN/QSO most likely
insufficient excess for M type star by color
low PM, unimpressive excess
LC suggests giant, barely sufficient excess
low PM, M type by color, excess ~ 1.5, not much to look at
#galaxy , #agn?
M type star by color with insufficient excess
M type star by color with insufficient excess
excess ~ 2.2 with Halpha emission, possibly a distant faint YSO, YSOc III in Marton+, low PM, to be vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
YSOc with Ha emission, pretty faint
barely sufficient excess for type and a little extended at W4
late type star with not a whole lot going for it, low PM, W1-W4=1.3
Type III Marton+ YSOc but very faint Rmag 19.260
now added to Be star spreadsheet
#galaxy or #agn
multiple unfortunately, clearly seen in SDSS9 color plates
#Galaxy / #AGN
#multiple
needs vetting to Faint M /YSO sheet
low PM variable late type star
low PM M type star by color with OK excess
likely a #QSO / #AGN
M type star by color with low PM and barely sufficient excess
LPV late type star, likely giant
Ha emission but little excess for M type star by color
low PM, barely enough excess for type
#galaxy
nothing impressive far as excess and PM go, plus extended
low Pm late type star with little excess, not much to see
insufficient excess for M type star by color
AGN/QSO looking, multiple as well by the looks of it
Classic YSO SED, Class I/II YSOc in Marton+, low PM, to be vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
To be vetted to Round 3 sheet
A2 IV early type star with 12/22um excess, Class III YSOc (Marton+), decent PMS, GAIA plx 2.04, GALEX UV emission. likely YSO
unimpressive PM and excess, YSOc
listed as LSP variable, Vamp 0.87, good excess but low PM. not sure about this one..
late type variable star
nice bump there at 12+22um, ok PM for late type star, Marton+ YSOc
SR variable, giant
late type star, low PM, unimpressive excess
LPV, a likely giant
#galaxy
pretty low excess, low PM, late type, not much worth following up
semireg PV with Vamp 2.18, #giant
low PM, ok excess, late type star
Semi-reg PV
too little excess for M type star by color
low PM, unimpressive excess
SR+L variable, giant
Late type star with OK IRX, low PM
Classic SED YSO, Marton+ I/II YSOc, needs vetting to Faint M/YSO sheet
Late type star with large 3.2 Vamp - likely giant
To be vetted to Rd3
K2/3 by color, good excess, slightly elongated in DSS2 images, might be a blend, decent PM, Marton+ I/II YSOc
known YSO+dust, Spitzer observed
late type star with ok excess, worth looking at
decent chance of being an AGN, with the other problems, not worth picking out
classic YSO shape SED, Marton+ class I/II YSOc, Ha emission, now being vetted to FaintM/YSO sheet
insufficient excess for M type star by color
little excess and extended
insufficient excess for M type star by color
YSOc with good excess
low PM and unimpressive IRE
Rapid Variable but also insufficient excess for M type star by color
Ha emission but with little excess above requirements for M type star by color
insufficient excess for M type star by color
barely enough excess for M type star, nothing exceptional here
insufficient excess for M type star by color
low PM and Vamp ~ 0.7, likely M giant
insufficient excess for M type star
marginal excess for type
well.. either a quasar or a galaxy, or both
insufficient excess for M type star by color
insufficient excess for M type star by color
good excess
barely sufficient excess for M type by color, low PM, likely an M giant, not of interest
that is some serious dropping out there.
late type star with good excess and Ha emission, YSOc
SR+L variable, insufficient excess, M giant
not round, likely #blend
#galaxy
barely sufficient excess for M type star by color, not of interest
early type A0 star with 22um excess, but unfortuately very extended at W4
looks like a #blend?
Barely sufficient excess for an M type star by color
Marton+ YSOc with decent excess
definitely worth a further look seems not round in DSS2 images?
interesting object, Edelson SI makes it unlikely to be AGN, Marton+ YSOc but also symbiotic star candidate possible AGB type
good excess worth vetting to faint YSO/M dwarf
M type star by color with insufficient excess
actually a triple system it seems, rho1=~2arcsec, rho2=~28arcsec, not a great candidate due to sep and extension
some debate about classification, SDDS says galaxy, most recent says star; however good excess (~2.2) for type, possible unidentified YSOc
M giant from Pickles+, excess and PM seem to agree
clear YSO SED, Class I/II YSOc Marton+, some possible contamination from nearby star but a good candidate, needs vet to Faint YSO/M dwarf
VizieR data suggests possible AGN, Edelson+ SI=0.687, W1-W2 > 0.8; but also GALEX UV source; YSO not out of question; possible multiple?
quite a lot of excess here though ~ 2.2, unusual for an M giant
G-type star, unfortunately also a multiple
#galaxy
I'd go with #agn on this one as it's classified as stellar source in all catalogs, probably a new #AGNc
insufficient excess for M type star
an unremarkable late type star with little excess and low PM
Large error bars but very good excess, class I/II YSO in Marton+; possible faint bg objects
an interestingly shaped #galaxy
already studied for transitional disk
#AGN
repeat
insufficient IRE
most likely a galaxy by SED and VizieR data
This seems to be a K giant with considerable excess, something we're definitely interested in; not sure if a bg galaxy may be involved
L variable, likely giant
agreed on #debrisdiskc
insufficient IRE for M type star by color
insufficient IRE for M type star by color
late type star with unimpressive PM that barely meets excess requirement
SR+L variable, likely giant
#galaxy
#galaxy
vetted to Faint M/YSO
Vetted to Rd3, known debris disk
vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
now vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
Now vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
insufficient IRE for M type star
now vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
insufficient excess for M type star
HPM star, vetted to Faint M/YSO sheet
Vetted to Faint M / YSO sheet
Vetted to Faint M/YSO spreadsheet
Now vetted to Rd3
insufficient IRE for M type star by color
M type star by color with insufficient IRE
looks like M star based on color to me and insufficient IRE for that type
SED suggests YSO; YSOc in Marton+2016; H-alpha emission, great excess; good candidate to be vetted to Faint YSO sheet Vmag 15.95
YSOc, SED suggests same, good candidate to look at, to be vetted to Rd3
insufficient IR excess for late type star
nice clean A2V early type star with excess, a good candidate, to be vetted to Rd3
MISC variable 0.5 Vamp with ~2.4 IRE, possible YSO?
LB variable -> giant?
insufficient IRE for M type star by color
Marton+2016 YSOc
Marton+2016 YSOc, good excess for type
Semireg PV
insufficient IRE for M type star by color
Marton+2016 YSOc
insufficient excess for M type star by color
insufficient excess for M type star (by color)
SR+L variable, low PM, likely M giant
Marton+2016 YSOc
Be star
M type (by color) MISC variable with insufficient IRE
Marton+2016 YSOc
High PM star with large excess, possible M dwarf with disk
Marton+2016 YSOc, good excess for type
Marton+2016 YSOc, good excess for type
Marton+2016 YSOc, good excess
also looks like a W1 dropout though w1sat is small
insufficient excess for M type star by color
insufficient IRE for M type star (by color)
late type star, excess unspectacular but good PM, possible M dwarf
late type star with large excess for type and H-alpha emission
#galaxy by SED
early type star with 22um excess but extended and likely contaminated
M by color, barely enough excess and SR variable, likely giant
Large excess at 12 and 22um, fitted sptype M3V (Pickles+2010) with dist 27pc, very good candidate possible M dwarf with disk
decent PM for type
Mira Ceti type variable with large Vamp, likely M giant
Marton+2016 YSOc, ok excess for type
insufficient IRE for M type star by color
MISC #variable M type star by color, with insufficient IRE
#blend #multiple
A0 spectral type, 22um excess, YSOc in Marton+2016, plx 1.66, vetting to Rd3
#QSO / #AGN by SED, #noao
Marton+2016 YSOc, late type star by color
YSOc in Marton+2016, probable member of Alessi 12 Open Cluster, good excess, late type by color
insufficient IRE for M class star (by color)
insufficient IRE for M class star (by color)
M giant SR+L #variable
MISC #variable with Vamp=0.8 and unimpressive PM
SED seems to suggest #galaxy yet it looks point-like in Aladin and UCAC4 says star though excess seems very large
Recently confirmed Be star
W1 dropout, W1sat=0.980
W1 dropout, W1sat=0.662
w1 dropout, w1sat=0.7
#multiple in DSS2Red+IR
I'll put my money on planetary nebula for this one, though all records indicate star - maybe new PN?
hardly sufficient excess for late type star + on-edge multiple = no
W1 dropout. bad candidate. bad. next.
that's uh.. an interesting error bar you've got there mr 2MASS K band; also good excess for late type star; PM low but worth a look
Variable star, Vamp~0.4, low PM -> likely #giant
low PM late type star with no spectacular excess - likely #giant
#multiple in IRSA at 9 o'clock
Mira Ceti variable candidate and also W1 dropout W1sat 0.174
Late type star, low PM but ok excess, worth a second look
nice bright B8V HD star with excess, off to Rd3 with you
YSO acc to Simbad, SED is pretty wild, v large W1-W4 excess ~ 7.5; B9e sp type, but D quality so could possible be an A0e? To rd3 it goes
Be star, Be star burning bright, In the forests of the night; What immortal hand or eye, Could frame thy fearful symmetry?
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.7
Variable star in the Sagittarius Dwarf with Vamp ~ 2, likely a #giant
insufficient excess for late type star
YSOc in Marton+2016
Mira Ceti #variable
insufficient IRE for late type star ~ 0.5
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.6
#repeat
#giant
late type star with insufficient IRE ~ 0.8
pretty low PM late type star, excess ok but not spectacular, worth a lookover I guess
low PM MISC Variable with 0.43 Vamp so likely #giant
late type star with good excess
mid-type star with good excess, G5V in Pickles+2010, vetting to Rd3
MISC Variable late type star Vamp ~ 0.5, low PM likely #giant
late type star with insufficient IRE ~ 0.4
late type star with good excess ~ 2.4
late type star with insufficient IRE ~ 0.8
late type star with insufficient IRE ~0.7
#TTauri binary, a very nice example of protoplanetary disk, but very well studied already, may be worth vetting to check the refs in detail
large error bar on W1 with W1sat=0.174, but good excess for type ~ 2.1 and decent PM, worth a look
not of interest to us, but interesting in itself, one of two examples of potential "iron stars" known so far
looks contaminated to me
barely meets the 0.9 IRE threshold so I dont think it is worth bothering with
SED suggests YSO, YSOc in Marton+2016, vetting to rd3, possible on-edge multiples, needs checking
V* GO Tau - T Tauri YSO + known disk, extraordinarily well studied with 100+ references
MISC Variable with Vamp ~ 0.9 + insufficient excess for late type star; probable M #giant
insufficient IRE for late type star ~ 0.7
red clump stars are still #giants, also SR+L variable so no good
SRB #variable M #giant
#agb star
insufficient IRE for late type star
#extended at W4
Unfortunately a prominent on-circle multiple that looks to be contaminating the situation
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.8
looks like a multiple with a bkg #galaxy at 1.5 arcsec distance according to SDDS records; shame it's listed as VB8M7V sp type Pickles+
Low pm late type star with relatively low excess ~ 1.2 and Vamp ~ 0.6, likely and M #giant
unfortunately dont think there's any way to weed out the excess from the different components on this one - sep is 2.5 not great + nebula
well this is certainly an interesting one - a binary T Tauri YSO in a nebula from the looks of it - IR excess seems to support it
SED indicates #YSO, YSOc in Marton+2016, large excess, late type by color, looks a bit suspicious in DSS2 images, possible multiple, vet Rd3
late type with marginal excess, not much to look at
#repeat
classic #YSO shape SED, new YSOc, no refs, cirrus contam at W3+W4 otherwise clean, v large excess, Vmag 16.8, vetting to Faint obj sheet
beautiful classic YSO shape SED w/ v lg excess, YSOc in Marton+2016, no refs, clean images Vmag ~ 11.9, sp type K2 by color, vetting to Rd3
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.5
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.8
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.6
nice one, known M2 class YSO + disk, extensively studied unfortunately
M7III in Pickles, low pm, we'll leave it at that
insufficient excess ~ 0.8 and Vamp = 0.8 -> #giant
YSOc in Marton+2016
insufficient excess for late type star W1-W4~0.8
insufficient excess for late type star W1-W4~0.6
#Quasar
Late type star, YSOc in Marton+2016, good excess for type, Vmag=15.89, vetting to faint YSO/M dwarf
YSOc in Marton+ 2016, seems worth a look, though very faint
SED suggests YSO, YSOc in Marton+2016, Vmag 12.56, F0II fitted spectral type in Pickles+2010, vetting to Rd3
MISC Variable Late Type Star with insufficient excess for type W1-W4~0.8
SR+L variable late type star
#blend
Late type star with insufficient IR excess W1-W4~0.5
MISC/SR Variable with insufficient excess for late type star
SED suggests YSO, YSOc in Marton+2016, contamination or artifact at DSS2 IR, on-circle multiple 8 o'clock, Vmag 13.689, vetting to Rd3
strange one, SED suggests YSO, large excess and YSOc in Marton+2016, however also Semi-Reg Pulsating Variable which says #giant?
SED indicates YSO, YSOc in Marton+ 2016, good excess, clean images, late type star by color, vetting to Rd3
MISC Variable late type star with good PM, good excess, low-ish Vamp (0.4), Vmag 11.9
Mira Ceti Variable late type star
low PM but excess above requirements for late type star so worth a look I guess
SED c/w YSO, unlisted, likely new YSOc, low PM but large excess, Vmag 14.939, seems like a very #goodcandidate, clean imgs, vetting to Rd3
Mira Ceti Variable late type star
MISC Variable late type star with insufficient excess for type (~0.6)
insufficient excess, late type star, low PM, very distant, nothing to see here, move along 😄
late type MISC variable with 0.9 Vamp, likely M #giant
#early type star, known IRE, good excess (0.5), not studied for disk, may be problematic on-circle multiple 5 o'clock, extended @ W4 vet Rd3
not 100% certain but IRSA images suggest a #blend and/or #multiple 1 o'clock and 4 o'clock
SED c/w YSO, YSOc in Marton+ 2016, good excess, vetting to Rd3
SED cw YSO, No Vmag, YSOc in Marton+ 2016, large excess, images clean, but faint, vetting to Faint M dwarf + YSO list
insufficient IR excess for type W1-W4 ~ 0.5
late type star with insufficient IR excess W1-W4 ~ 0.4
also insufficient excess for type W1-W4 ~ 0.4
missing DSS2 and 2MASS images
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.5
Semi Regular Pulsating Variable late type star (Richards+, 2012), with un-spectacular excess for type (~1.1); LC suggests #giant
excess also very barely in range for late type star - 0.905, likely not worth following up
low PM and no spectacular excessfor late type star (1.1)
#multiple
Semi-reg pulsating late-type #variable with insufficient excess - #giant
YSOc in Marton+,2016; late type star by SED, Vmag=15.03
late type star, excess only 1.1, Variable with Vamp 0.41, PM not horrible but not spectacular either not much to look at here
disturbingly small error bars 😄
SED c/w YSO, images clean, #noao, Vmag 17.9 so possibly too faint, large excess, YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), #goodcandidate vetting to Rd3
insufficient excess for late type star ~ 0.4
Semi-regular pulsating Star, Vamp 1.29, LC characteristic of late type #giant
#goodcandidate fitted Pickles spectral type M3V, SED indicates YSO with large excess, hell of a dist est though - 14062pc 😄 vetted to Rd3
Haro 5-97 - SED indicates YSO, YSOc in Marton, 2016, v good excess + H-alpha emission, images clean, vetting to Rd3 #goodcandidate
too little excess for late type star ~0.4
Mira Variable candidate + classed as probable double star in UCAC4, unknown sep
#galaxy
Mira Ceti Variable star
late type, YSOc in (Marton+, 2016)
DDOI in main
#early type star, sp type A2/F0III, good excess, YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), images clean, vetting to Rd3
possible W1 dropout as well
MISC Variable with huge Vamp=3 low PM #giant
also W1 #dropout
late type + low PM + low-ish excess (~1.1) + MISC variable with 0.7 Vamp = probable #giant
W1-W4 only ~0.2 so too little excess for type
Double star fit according to UCAC4, DSS2 IRSA images seems to agree, definite blend - sep unknown unfortunately, looks small
#agb star
SR+L Variable and seems like it's also a W1 #dropout
the on-circle multiple isn't hugely problematic to me, but the W1 dropout is. too bad,had a nice ~2.9 IR excess, very good for its type
moves off crosshairs completely in 2MASS images unfortunately
low PM, but good excess for type, worth a gander
on-circle #multiple 6 o'clock and nothing spectacular going for this one
large error bar on W1 with possible dropout (w1sat=0.12) however large excess for type (~3.1), worth vetting for second opinion
late type (double? UCAC4) star with insufficient excess (~0.5) for type
YSOc with v large excess, some shifting, a little extended at W4 possible contamination, worth a closer look though
SED show clear W1 #dropout unfortunately on this one, W1sat~0.2
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), not round in first image, possible #blend though no clear evidence in IRSA, vetting to Rd3
very interesting SED, listed as both AGNc and YSOc, but Spitzer observed and classified as star+dust; large excess, vetting to Rd3
SR+L Variable Star, likely #giant
insufficient excess for late type star , W1-W4 only ~0.3
IRSA Finder DSS2 images suggest #blend + #multiple
clear #multiple in DSS2 IR IRSA image
#galaxy
SED suggests new #YSO, also #YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) but likely too faint, vetting to Rd3 anyway as interesting
Agree W1 dropout
#giant in (Gigoyan+ 2012)
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016)
excess just under the required for late type stars ~0.85 so probably not worth bothering with as there's nothing else of note on this one
#YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) but #contaminated by nearby star
#carbon #star
SED indicates YSO, already a DDOI in Main Vetting List
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), vetting to Rd3
#galaxy by SED
#noao no Vmag, but good excess ~2 and decent PM for type, may be too faint but vetting to Rd3 for final call
SRB variable M #giant also with insufficient excess for type
#AGB candidate
likely M giant, with insufficient excess ~ 0.6
unfortunately IRSA 2MASS indicates #multiple at 10 o'clock
semi-regular PV star
#galaxy by SED
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) good excess
late type star, nothing special but no major problems either, vetting to rd3
listed as star in several catalogs but SED leans towards #QSO/#AGN
insufficient excess for late type star w1-w4~0.4
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016)
#multiple in IRSA Finder
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) with good excess though possibly too faint
SRB Variable giant
SED suggests new YSO with large excess however it's likely too faint with Vmag 18.19. Vetting to rd3
Seyfert #galaxy / #agn
#galaxy by SED
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) with good excess, worth a look
hmm listed as both AGNc and YSOc, but this is either a merge or there's definitely another object at 5 o'clock in there.shame, huge excess
#galaxy
too little excess for late type star w1-w4~0.5
too little excess for late type star w1-w4~0.5
#galaxy
#repeat
#galaxy
too little excess for late type star W1-W4~0.7
too little excess for type, W1-W4~0.87, also low PM not likely worth following up
w1-w4~0.6, too little excess for type
YSOc but likely too faint, vetted to rd3
YSOc but unfortunately a clear multiple as well
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), may be too faint though, vetting for good measure
too little excess for type and very faint w1-w4~0.6
Fairly large extension at WISE4 though. Also a double star with sep 16.3arcsec
something's clearly dodgy with this one, 2MASS IRSA images seem to suggest either a blend or a non-star object
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016) but likely too faint, vetting to round 3 for good measure
judging by shape and images this is a #blend but also multiple at 4-5 o'clock in IRSA finder so sadly its a dud
SRB Variable - #giant
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), good excess, vetting to round three
insufficient IRE for type
looks like same position across all WISE bands to me so I'd say not shifting
decent PM and good excess for type, vetting to third round
Be star, sent to John
agree with #multiple visible in IRSA Finder at 5 o'clock
#multiple in IRSA Finder
too little excess for type w1-w4~0.7
W1-W4~0.6 which is too little for M type by color #noire
LC Vamp ~2.0 suggests M giant, #noAO no Vmag
YSOc in (Marton+, 2016), worth a look
also #IRE with w1-w4~0.4
#multiple in IRSA Finder SDSS images at 3 o'clock
on-circle #multiple at 4 o'clock
W1sat > 0.2 I'd say dropout on this one not worth pursuing
#galaxy
#galaxy
#YSO but unfortunately shows a #multiple at DSS2 Red+IR at 10 o'clock
at least one other faint bg object so #multiple
W1 dropout and likely multiple
too little excess for type W1-W4 ~ 0.7, very faint
#AGN candidate but SED suggests #YSO. SI in Edelson+2012 is 0.78, leaning towards not-AGN but can't be sure - huge excess tho
very good excess for type and Halpha emission, but then the LC is more giant than anything else. worth looking at close at least I guess
too little excess for type
I'd incline more towards #YSO on this one, also has a high Si in Edelson 2012+ so unlikely to be an AGN.
no Vmag, interesting but unlikely to be in the category of objects of interest to us
on Main vetting list
both IRSA Finder and VizieR records suggest #multiple at around 1arcsec at 12 oclock
going to chuck this as an M giant, barely crosses the 0.9 threshold, PM is low-ish with huge error margins, very faint, not worth following
not 100% sure but looks like #multiple faint background objects within circle
strange case this one. GSC3.2/PPMXL/IGSL indicate two sources with radically different PMs not sure if measuring error, leaving this for now
Vamp=1.42 and low PM, I think we can safely guess this to be an M giant
excess is ok, but WISE record and SED suggest W1 dropout with W1sat=0.158. also low PM M class star so not really a great candidate,skipping
well poop, almost done vetting this when multiple rears its ugly head on IRSA finder. roughly at 3:30 o'clock can't miss it #multiple sadly
vetted to Round3
#multiple at 12 o'clock
#late-type star with #I-R-E W1-W4=0.47
#AGB star 2MASS J18193573+1839173 -- Asymptotic Giant Branch Star (He-burning)
#galaxy
likely dropout with W1sat 0.112
IRSA images also suggest #multiple on this one
based on IRSA I would say no on multiple but not 100%
W1 dropout
#AGN / #QSO + #Galaxy
nicely squiggly though 😄
#blend + W1-W4=0.7
likely giant by low PM
looks like #AGN / #QSO
#multiple in IRSA Finder
Unfortunately a clear #multiple from the IRSA Finder images
M5.5 Giant (Gigoyan+ 2012)
#galaxy
#galaxy
Vamp=0.8 low PM likely giant
#galaxy
likely #giant
most likely #AGN unfortunately according to Si = 1.347 in (Edelson+, 2012)
insufficient excess W1-W4=0.4
likely #blend
SED suggests AGN and is a candidate in (Edelson+, 2012)
Be star plus likely W1 dropout
likely W1 dropout, W1sat=0.155
decent excess but low PM, likely a giant
SED suggests #plantetary #nebula though there are no records to confirm it
low pm, excess < 0.9 likely giant
W1-W4~0.5 so not enough excess
Class M9III (Pickles+,2010) #giant
#multiple
#blazar
#galaxy
distance = 4800 parsecs, M giant
#pn #planetary-nebula
possible #multiple at 5'oclock
#multiple
carbon star, extremely well studied
high Vamp 1.1, low PM, likely a #giant
would say #agn by SED
#galaxy
likely #blend judging by visual
likely W1 #dropout w1sat=-.169
Unfortunately #contaminated by secondary source, 4.4arcsec away, both listed as YSOs, but no good
var LC suggests #giant
likely M giant
#mira variable
probable #giant w1-w4=0.95 and low pm
low excess for type W1-W4=0.8 and possible W1 dropout
#AGN
#AGN #QSO
high errors margins on PM, decent excess (~1.5) but #multiple
likely #AGN #QSO , only classified as non-star in VizieR
likely M giant
likely M giant
W1-W4=0.3, too little excess
likely an #AGN it is an AGN candidate in Vizier
#quasar #QSO
Vamp = 1.3 likely M giant
low pm, likely an M giant
too little excess for type W1-W4=~0.5
#giant
late-type, low PM, likely an M giant
Seyfert 1 #Galaxy
#QSO #quasar
#galaxy
#galaxy
#galaxy
#galaxy
#galaxy in VizieR, but SED seems to match a new #AGN / #QSO
#yso
possible multiple + contamination at W4
looks like a likely #blend
slightly off-center and a little bit extended in W4 but may be worth a look still
SED suggests #galaxy on this one but no records in VizieR to confirm it as such
#galaxy
also #contaminated in IRSA WISE
Agree
SED typical for early-type star; HD 131686 -- #Star in #SIMBAD spectral type A0IV/V; heavily #contaminated at WISE 4
Added to Round Three, though may be too faint
#galaxy #extended at WISE4 #noAO SDSS J143112.97+063159.8
Agree
Agree #noAO
Confirmed #multiple in IRSA images
Agree #noAO possible faint #multiple as well
#multiple #extende #noAO
#extended at W4, #noAO
#multiple #extended
#multiple #extended
#multiple #extended OGLE BLG-LPV 127718 -- #Semi-regular #pulsating #Star in #SIMBAD
Agree
likely faint #multiple, definitely #contaminated #noAO
Agree #multiple
Agree
#multiple #noAO
Agree #multiple
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
SED suggests possible #YSO however it is listed in (Edelson+, 2012) as an #AGN candidate, WISE data indicates high variability at W1+2
Agree
#multiple #noAO
Agree
#multiple #noAO
#multiple #blend #noAO
Agree
#multiple #noAO
SED suggest possible #YSO, but #multiple #blend and heavily #contaminated by nearby source in W3+4
#multiple possible #blend #noAO
Agree
Agree
#multiple #blend #extended at W4 #noAO
SED suggest #late-type #star, also by color, W1-W4~2, but has low pm and no CSDR2 data so assuming an M giant
Agree probable #QSO (Flesch, 2010)
heavily #extended and #contaminated in W3+4, SED suggests #YSO with #Halpha emission in (Barentsen+, 2014)
#multiple #blend #extended #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
Vamp ~ 0.7 with low pm seems to indicate M giant
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
likely B giant, already on DD vetting list
#multiple #blend #contaminated #noAO
#multiple #star IRAS 19316+2544 in #SIMBAD
Agree #multiple #extended in W4 #contaminated in IRSA WISE 3/4
Agree faint #multiple
#multiple probable #blend #noAO
Agree also #extended in W4 and #contaminated
Agree
Agree
on-edge #multiple, possibly others fainter in bg, #late-type #star by color, low PM, no Vamp data
possible #multiple faint and #extended at W4 #noAO
TYC 471-222-1 #star spectral type K2III, but unfortunately heavily #contaminated in W3 and W4 by nearby object
Agree on #multiple/#blend
Confirmed #galaxy J095859.72+212044.6
Agree #multiple faint obj and #extended
Agree
faint #multiple #noAO
Agree
Agree
#multiple #extended #noAO #spitzer observed object in #MIPSGAL
#multiple CGCS 4770 -- #carbon #star in #SIMBAD
Agree
possibly #contaminated by nearby source, unclear in IRSA but definite faint #multiple objects in circle; #noAO
Agree + drop at W1 though W1sat=0
#multiple possible #blend #noAO
Agree, probable M giant by low pm, not an object of interest
#multiple #noAO
Agree
#multiple #extended #noAO
Agree #multiple
Agree
Agree
#multiple #contaminated #noAO
Agree
Agree
#multiple #blend with background source - can be clearly seen in IRSA
#multiple #blend #noAO
#multiple #contaminated #noAO
#multiple #noAO
#multiple IRAS 17349-3722 #infrared source in #SIMBAD
Agree
#multiple #extended #noAO
one hell of a #blend there #multiple #noAO
#multiple #noAO
likely faint #multiple #noAO
Added to third round DDOI
Not an object of interest for observation currently
Agree
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
possible #YSO by SED but probable faint #multiple objects in bg and heavily contaminated in WISE 3+4, confirmed in IRSA WISE images #noAO
likely #multiple faint objects #noAO
#multiple possible #blend #noAO
#multiple probable #blend possibly #contaminated in WISE4 #noAO
Agree likely #blend
#multiple #blend #noAO
#multiple CGCS 2479 #carbon #star in #SIMBAD
#multiple faint objects #noAO seems extended possibly #contaminated by nearby source
Agree
Agree #multiple
#multiple #extended #noAO
Agree
#multiple #extended #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
#double #star too bad for the shift, would be a good candidate
IRSA images confirm #contaminated
Agree
#multiple #blend #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
#multiple
Agree #multiple
#multiple #noAO
#multiple
#multiple #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
#multiple #noAO
likely #blend but also dropout at W1, sat1=0.144
Agree also #faint multiple objects present
#multiple faint on-circle objects
#multiple #extended OGLE BLG-LPV 32809 Semi-regular #pulsating #star in #SIMBAD
#multiple #noAO
Agree #multiple
#multiple #noAO
late type #star by SED, #noAO, possible on-circle faint #multiple, Vmag 16.340, low PM, likely M giant
#multiple #noAO
Agree #multiple
Agree + #multiple #noAO
Agree
#multiple #noAO
#multiple faint objects #noAO
Agree
Agree
#multiple #noAO
Agree
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
#multiple #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
Agree also probable #multiple in DSS2 images
Agree
#multiple #noAO
#multiple #extended #contaminated #variable semi-regular #pulsating #star OGLE BLG-LPV 8305 in #SIMBAD
#multiple faint objects #extended in WISE4, #noAO
#YSO candidate in #SIMBAD but unfortunately obvious #multiple in DSS2
#multiple #noAO
Agree
#multiple #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
#extended in WISE4, W1-W4=0.424 #noexcess #noAO
Agree #multiple #blend
Agree
probable M giant, with low PM, but added to Round Three due to significant W1-W4 excess and Vamp<1
Agree
#multiple #noAO
Agree
Agree, M-type #star in LAMOST DR1 (Luo+, 2015)
#multiple #noAO
faint #multiple objects at 1 and 5 o'clock, SED indicates late-type #star, W1-W4=0.559 #noexcess; #Halpha emission in (Barentsen+, 2014)
#multiple #extended #noAO
Agree #multiple #noAO
#multiple #noAO
most likely #multiple in DSS2 Red+IR at 4 o'clock, likely #contaminated in W4
#multiple #noAO
#multiple #infrared source in #SIMBAD IRAS 19030+1645
Agree
Agree, interesting drop on SED at W3
Agree
clear #blend at 12 o'clock in DSS2/2MASS IRSA images #vista #variable #star (Minniti+, 2014) #noAO
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
#multiple #noAO
#multiple #noAO
Agree #noAO
Agree
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
#multiple #star IRAS 17280-2229 in #SIMBAD
#multiple #extended #noAO
probable #blend #extended #contaminated
Agree #extended #noAO
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
Agree #contaminated
late-type #star by SED but unfortunately #contaminated in WISE4
Agree
Possible faint multiple are prob. imaging artifacts, so I still consider this a #goodcandidate though other params may not make it a DDOI
Believe initial report on PM to be erroneus, URAT(Zacharias+ 2015) seems to give it 6.9/14.3 so not very high.
#multiple #noAO probable late-type #star #halpha source in (Barentsen+, 2014)
Agree
Agree
#extended field #contaminated in IRSA images possible #multiple #noAO
Agree #multiple faint obj
Agree #contaminated
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO SED suggests late-type star
Agree
Confirm #galaxy SDSS J154049.20+383614.7 also in #galaxyzoo1 and 2 catalogues
#multiple #extended #noAO
Agree, confirmed galaxy
SDSS J222037.45+055158.2
#multiple #extended late-type #star #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO SED suggests late-type star confirmed by color
#multiple faint bg objects #noAO SED suggests late-type #star
#multiple #star #simbad IRAS 18254+0657
Agree, unfortunately no good due to excessive contamination in WISE
Agree; W4-W1=0.563, probably no excess
#multiple #extended #noAO
#multiple #contaminated #noAO
Agree
#multiple #extended #infrared source IRAS 18497-0057 in #simbad
likely #contaminated in WISE4 visible in IRSA
Agree
#multiple #contaminated #noAO
Agree
#extended in WISE4 #noAO SED typical of late-type #star; little info in VizieR
late-type #star probable #multiple on circle and other faint objects #noAO
known #quasar #QSO 2MASS J01572105+1712484 #simbad
Agree
late-type #star by color; #Halpha emission; possible #multiple at 12 o'clock on circle; added to Third Round
#multiple probably #contaminated, #noAO, SED indicates late-type #star
SED indicates late-type star; #multiple faint objects in bg, #noAO;
#spitzer obseved object in #GLIMPSE
Agree although pm in UCAC is only -17.3/26.9 so not that high
Agree
#multiple faint objects, #extended in WISE4, #noAO
Agree #blend
Agree, SED suggest #QSO / #AGN seems to be an unknown for now
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
faint #multiple in DSS2 #noAO
#noAO SED suggests YSO but intensely #contaminated in all WISE frames
Agree #multiple
Agree
Agree
#multiple slightly #extended in WISE4 #noAO
Agree
IRSA images do not suggest blend, though DSS2 Blue image missing, also #spitzer observed in #GLIMPSE no Vmag very little info in VizieR
Agree
#extended in WISE4, SED suggests #galaxy confirmed SDSS J113600.10+554858.7
Agreed also #contaminated in WISE1+2 visible on IRSA
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
Agree, highly #contaminated
#multiple #extended likely #contaminated #noAO
Agree #multiple slightly #extended in WISE4
#multiple #contaminated #noAO
likely #contaminated from IRSA images
Agree
#multiple #blend #star IRAS 19192+0509 in #simbad
#multiple #extended #noAO
Agree #multiple
late type #star by color, #noAO, slightly #extended in WISE4 but no sign of contamination in IRSA, W4-W1=0.660, J8.514 H7.296 K6.785
#multiple #noAO
Agree
possible faint #multiple at 8 o'clock #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
#multiple possibly #blended #star in #simbad
#multiple #noAO
#multiple possible #blend #noAO #spitzer observed object in GLIMPSE/MIPSGAL J11.489 H9.041 K7.807, no Vmag
#multiple #Simbad Semi-regular #pulsating #star #contaminated
#multiple #noAO
#multiple on-edge late-type #star #noAO
#noAO #multiple #interesting listed as 2nd component of #double #star in (Zacharias+, 2012)
known #AGN candidate from (Kouzuma+, 2010) (Brescia+, 2015), high #redshift
late-type #star J9.480 H8.285 K7.778 (Cutri+ 2012) Vmag 17.420 (Zacharias+ 2005)
possible faint #multiple, slightly #extended WISE4, maybe #goodcandidate
looks like late type #star J9.971 H8.747 K8.105 (Cutri+ 2013) Vmag 16.560 (Zacharias+ 2005)
possible on-edge #multiple in DSS2 RED+IR
#VISTA #variable #star #spitzer observed object in MIPSGAL/GLIMPSE
#VISTA #variable #star
Confirmed #starburst #galaxy SDSS J104347.85+181158.3
Confirmed #multiple and #extended in WISE4
looks somewhat #extended in WISE4 as well
#multiple #extended possibly #contaminated in WISE4
#multiple #extended #noAO #star J9.894 H8.846 K8.471, Vmag 14.91 (Girard+, 2011)
#multiple #extended #noAO
#multiple #extended #spitzer observed GLIMPSE 1
#multiple late type #star #noAO J7.815 H6.700 K6.180 (Cutri+ 2012) , Vmag 16.13 (Girard+, 2011)
#multiple #extended #contaminated #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO #star #noexcess W1-W4=0.361
#multiple #extended in WISE4
#multiple faint sources, #extended in WISE4, J12.240 H9.894 K8.703 (Cutri+ 2012) #spitzer object possible #VISTAvariable #noAO
#multiple #extended #noAO
#multiple #extended late type #star WISE W1-W4=0.518 so may have #noexcess
definite on-edge #multiple, #noAO late type #star in VizieR J9.345 H8.326 K8.014 V13.641
#multiple #variable #star in #simbad J17512422-3337521 probably #contaminated
#multiple faint bg sources, extended in WISE3+4, probable contamination
#multiple faint objects in background
#multiple #nosimbad
#multiple #extended #variable #star VVV J170343.57-414230.91 in (Minniti+, 2014) #nosimbad
Late type star, possible faint #multiple, extended in WISE4, #nosimbad, J9.745 K8.727 B15.550 V13.621 UCAC4 (Zacharias+, 2012)
#multiple #extended #nosimbad
#multiple #interesting bump at 12 microns #nosimbad
#multiple #nosimbad
#multiple ?
#multiple #extended /nosimbad #star VizieR (Lucas+ 2012)
#multiple #extended
#multiple faint objects also #extended #nosimbad
#multiple probable #star (STScI, 2006) (Lucas+ 2012) #nosimbad
not sure this is a #multiple
#multiple maybe #extended possible #variable #star VVV J162354.08-494817.46 in (Minniti+, 2014)
#extended #contaminated #nosimbad
#multiple #extended #contaminated
#extended #contaminated
no data in DSS2, seems extended in WISE #nosimbad probable #variable #star (Minniti+, 2014)
#multiple #contaminated
#multiple
possibly #multiple, #extended #contaminated #nosimbad
#multiple #variable #star
#multiple #contaminated #extended #nosimbad
#multiple #nosimbad
#extended in WISE4, possible #multiple #Simbad normal #star J 9.23 K 8.497
#nosimbad #multiple #extended
#multiple #Simbad Semi-regular pulsating Star J 8.304 K 6.998
#multiple #variable #star (Minniti+, 2014)
#extended #nosimbad
#multiple #nosimbad
#extended #galaxy #nosimbad
#goodcandidate #star possible #yso (?) Jmag 8.279 Kmag 6.395
possibly SDSS J133927.83+652151.6 ? #galaxy
#multiple #contaminated
#multiple
#multiple #extended
#extended
#multiple
#extended
#multiple
#multiple #extended #nosimbad
#multiple #nosimbad
#multiple #extended #nosimbad
#extended
#multiple #extended #nosimbad
#extended #multiple #nosimbad
#extended #offcrosshair #nosimbad
#multiple #extended #nosimbad
#Extended #NoSimbad