Follow Up Opportinity on FLWO Tillinghast 1.5m: Thanks for the Targets!

CWis000061 has at least 5 #star No AO in favorites section 5 & 4 : I don't know how to post them.
aw100007Kt
enp
1t8
13x
72n
3va
f8h

Posted February 8, 2014 3:04 AM

by Pini2013 translator, moderator in response to onetimegolfer's comment.

@onetimegolfer
Just copy the link above like this:
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00007kt and the magnitude and other info is in VizieR (on Bibliography on SIMBAD)
magnitud 11.349 or just use google 😉

Posted February 8, 2014 3:19 AM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00007af

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00007kt mag11.349
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000enp no AO
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000072n no AO
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003va no AO
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000f8h no AO
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000f6A no AO

Posted February 8, 2014 3:49 AM

by Pini2013 translator, moderator

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000068p no info

Posted February 8, 2014 4:51 AM

by TED91 moderator

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003o9 11.984 mag, NO info in SIMBAD. http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ52f88bff29a0&-out.add=.&-source=I/322A/out&UCAC4===321-070560

Posted February 8, 2014 9:26 AM

by TED91 moderator

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000033v 11.83 mag, Proper motions ~8.3 mas/yr

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00001tp 11.48 mag, NO info in SIMBAD. http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ52f88bff29a0&-out.add=.&-source=J/ApJS/203/32/table4&recno=20531

Posted February 8, 2014 9:35 AM

by Vinokurov moderator

And more, by voyager1682002 and few of me:

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00004xs

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000hx6

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00008pp

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00006rd

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00004ox

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00009bf

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00005qc

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00002i1

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000173

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003ij

Posted February 8, 2014 9:39 AM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00007e9

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000018v

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00005ko

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000gu8

Posted February 8, 2014 10:06 AM

by TED91 moderator

AWI0000cm7 12.943 mag, No information about Proper motion or Spectral type on SIMBAD. http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ52f88bff29a0&-out.add=.&-source=I/322A/out&UCAC4===432-000036

AWI00005rj 11.48 mag, NO info in SIMBAD. http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ52f88bff29a0&-out.add=.&-source=J/ApJS/203/32/table4&recno=26401

Posted February 8, 2014 10:25 AM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000047f - TYC 1521-203-1 RA: 16:52:36.064 DEC: +16:50:49.32 V=11.08mag known Cepheid - should this still be considered?

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00001js - 2MASS J10203915-1609182 RA: 10:20:39.153 DEC: -16:09:18.25 V=12.900mag radial velocity measurement has been done 2011AJ....141..187S but not sure if the spectrum has been released yet

Posted February 8, 2014 11:33 AM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000c7r

Does http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000036f count as it meets all the criteria?

Also, http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00004df

[EDIT] and

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000002d

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00005kl

Posted February 8, 2014 12:02 PM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00007di - TYC 6148-900-1 RA: 13:57:17.369 DEC: -20:41:32.17 V=11.48 mag large radial velocity (80km/s) so perhaps is really a binary?

Posted February 8, 2014 3:55 PM

by TED91 moderator

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003rb 13.416 mag, NO info in SIMBAD. http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ52f88bff29a0&-out.add=.&-source=I/322A/out&UCAC4===464-055726

Posted February 8, 2014 5:21 PM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00002k2

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000fih . Co-ordinates just fit and V-magnitude is 10.54

Posted February 8, 2014 5:45 PM

by Vinokurov moderator

And more:

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003qf

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000cot

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000gxt

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000011b

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000hss

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00005u3

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00001gy

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00001om

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00000hj

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00006m2

Posted February 8, 2014 6:44 PM

by TED91 moderator

[EDIT]

AWI00006jw 12.93 mag, NO info in SIMBAD. http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ52f88bff29a0&-out.add=.&-source=I/320/spm4&-c=222.6167187-23.1518226,eq=J2000,rs=0.006

AWI00001ar 12.979 mag, NO info in SIMBAD. http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ52f88bff29a0&-out.add=.&-source=I/322A/out&UCAC4===339-069080

AWI00005ab 11.561 mag, No information about Proper motion or Spectral type on SIMBAD. http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ52f88bff29a0&-out.add=.&-source=I/322A/out&UCAC4===718-057554

AWI00000d6 13.383 mag, http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ52f88bff29a0&-out.add=.&-source=I/322A/out&UCAC4===378-071546

AWI00005z3 12.996 mag, NO info in SIMBAD. http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ52f88bff29a0&-out.add=.&-source=I/322A/out&UCAC4===608-056807

Posted February 8, 2014 7:02 PM

by jdebes scientist, admin

Holy smokes guys--thanks for all the great suggestions!

Posted February 8, 2014 9:56 PM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000033

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00002qu

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000012o

Posted February 9, 2014 2:17 AM

by marckuchner scientist, admin

Wow--this is phenomenal! Thank you @artman40, @WizardHowl, @TED91, @Pini2013, @onetimegolfer, @silviug, @Vinokurov (and anybody I missed).

Posted February 9, 2014 3:38 AM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00005iy and http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000g6d are quite borderline good candidates.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00001l8 is a definitively good candidate. V 11.38

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000137 is a bit too bright. V 9.21

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00006n8 . V is 13 or something.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00005bm but there's no info on that object on SIMBAD.

Posted February 9, 2014 7:25 AM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000327 Semi-Regular pulsating star...
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000gbx no AO...
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00006jn No AO....
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00007cl No AO...
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000011b known

Posted February 9, 2014 3:40 PM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00007gn Star in a double system. Vmag=13.6

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000ftx is too bright (no brightness info in SIMBAD) and may already have been observed.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00004k9 is too bright again. (V=8.56)

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000042e . No SIMBAD info but by looking at it, its brightness is within limits.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000012e May be a galaxy behind a star. V-magnitude seems to be within limits.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000dru No SIMBAD info but V-magnitude seems to be within limits.

Posted February 9, 2014 3:59 PM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00001cj

N.B. where no Simbad information is available I go to SDSS DR10 for designation (if possible) and NOMAD1 (accessible through Vizier) for the visual magnitudes. NOMAD1 also sometimes has proper motion measurements.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003rc - 2MASS J16501051+1006237 RA: 16:50:10.51 DEC: +10:06:23.7 no Vmag but B=14.200, R=11.500, known Cepheid

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003tk - SDSS J164655.78+055300.1 RA: 16:46:55.78 DEC +05:53:00.17 V=13.090mag

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000068i - NOMAD1 1727-0033750 RA: 11:44:45.408 DEC: +82:47:23.96 V=13.450mag

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00002qe - SDSS J164534.02+183309.6 RA: 16:45:34.02 DEC +18:33:09.62 V=13.560mag, also known as IRAS 16433+1838, is seeing responsible for distorted shape? clean star-like image in SDSS DR10

Posted February 9, 2014 5:17 PM

by marckuchner scientist, admin

Gang, you've sent in so many good candidates. Can I add some other constraints?

For this first observing proposal, let's put together

A list of good candidates (with good SEDs V mag, RA, dec etc.) with NO info in SIMBAD

and

A second list of good candidates (with good SEDs, V mag, RA, dec etc.) that are in SIMBAD and have
Proper motion less than 30 mas/year, or no Proper Motion measured
AND a Spectral type that is not M (or any subclass of M, like M1 etc.)

You can look up the proper motion on SIMBAD---then take the R.M.S.
(i.e. square the two numbers, sum, and square root). Then check if the R.M.S. is less than 30 mas/year.

These constraints should guarantee that previous searches through the WISE archive have passed it by.

(We'll be coming back to the lesser candidates later on BTW)

Best,
Marc (Kooch)

Posted February 9, 2014 6:03 PM

by marckuchner scientist, admin

A list of good candidates (with good SEDs, V mag, RA, dec etc.) that are in SIMBAD and have
Proper motion less than 30 mas/year, or no Proper Motion measured
AND a Spectral type that is not M (or any subclass of M, like M1 etc.)

You can look up the proper motion on SIMBAD---then take the R.M.S.
(i.e. square the two numbers, sum, and square root). Then check if the R.M.S. is less than 30 mas/year.

These constraints should guarantee that previous searches through the WISE archive have passed it by.

(We'll be coming back to the lesser candidates later on BTW)

Best,
Marc (Kooch)

Posted February 9, 2014 6:07 PM

by Vinokurov moderator

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003l6

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00004on

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000009a

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00005bs

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000ehp

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003hc

Posted February 9, 2014 6:15 PM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000049x

That means that an object like this:

don't count due to them peaking in near-infrared?

Posted February 9, 2014 7:16 PM

by jdebes scientist, admin

Yes, the fact it peaks in the near-IR might not work as well. If you look at the G type star Marc pointed out earlier in this thread, that's sort of the best type of SED to look for, at least for this quick look campaign. As the project goes on, we'll look at everything in more depth.

Posted February 9, 2014 8:02 PM

Im sorry to say that for now ; someone that knows what they are doing with VizeR will have to get the data on my posts. I finally stopped to ask directions by pressing the help button. A lot to learn; I'll be back..

Posted February 9, 2014 8:51 PM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003rc

one more to add that comes under the category 2) [in Simbad, proper motion less than 30mas/yr, not known to be type M]

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000027u - 2MASS J16082203-0711061 RA: 16:08:22.041 DEC: -07:11:06.04 V=12.900mag, proper motion ~2.7mas/yr, radial velocity ~34km/s so potentially a binary?

of the other ones I've previously highlighted in this thread, these are also category 2)

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000047f - proper motion ~12.7mas/yr

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00001js - proper motion ~12.1mas/yr, radial velocity ~55km/s

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00007di - proper motion ~3.7mas/yr

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00002qe

The following two come under category 1) [nothing in Simbad]

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003tk

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000068i

Posted February 9, 2014 8:54 PM

by onetimegolfer in response to jdebes's comment.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00002mv Category 1.

Posted February 9, 2014 9:25 PM

by Pini2013 translator, moderator

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00007e9 proper motion 0.80 Spectral type: G5 D

category 2
I think @artman40 posted it before the new constraints

Posted February 10, 2014 12:05 AM

by jdebes scientist, admin in response to onetimegolfer's comment.

Vizier is kind of a firehose, and not every bit of information is completely reliable. If you quote something from Vizier, post a link to the catalog you got the info from so that we can check stuff out.

Thanks!

Posted February 10, 2014 12:11 AM

by Pini2013 translator, moderator in response to onetimegolfer's comment.

this one is between the new constraints
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00007kt 9.62 ( I guess spectral class F but I don't know)

Posted February 10, 2014 12:30 AM

Yes ; I am still trying to find Tyco2 catalog. working on it thou

Posted February 10, 2014 12:41 AM

by onetimegolfer in response to Pini2013's comment.

Go back to when this was posted they are below and above this

Posted February 10, 2014 12:44 AM

by Pini2013 translator, moderator

Category 1:
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00006pl no info

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00005bs no info

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00001tp no info

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000051l no info

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00004wm no info

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000068p no info

Posted February 10, 2014 1:23 AM

by Pini2013 translator, moderator in response to onetimegolfer's comment.

category 1:
http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00007cl no info

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000enp no info

Posted February 10, 2014 1:30 AM

by Pini2013 translator, moderator

category1

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000cdq no info

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000aoe no info

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000088 no info

category 2

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00000hj proper motion 4.55

Posted February 10, 2014 3:04 AM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI0000gwr : Category 1. Probably an early-type star.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00003bt : Category 1. Mid-late-type star.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00002xd Category 1. Late-type star. Possibly a binary star.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00002we Category 2. V-magnitude=12-13. Mid-late-type star (SIMBAD says it's a Mira variable so this may go against it). Proper motion: About 22.4.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000073v cannot go to first follow-up observations due to unfavorable co-ordinates. Peaks its brightness red light and its V-magnitude is 11.9.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00001ys Category 1. Could be a galaxy behind the star that emits infrared light.

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00006ua Category 1.

Posted February 10, 2014 5:13 AM

by TED91 moderator

I just edited all my posts and added more information. I hope it will be useful. 😃

Posted February 10, 2014 9:31 AM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00002gv Class 1. No SIMBAD info.

Posted February 10, 2014 3:35 PM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000047f TYC1521-203-1 v11.08

Posted February 10, 2014 6:56 PM

by TED91 moderator

AWI00007l0 - 12.89 mag, NO info in SIMBAD, http://vizier.u-strasbg.fr/viz-bin/VizieR-5?-ref=VIZ52f9336e37b2&-out.add=.&-source=J/ApJS/203/32/table4&recno=30409

Posted February 10, 2014 8:16 PM

by marckuchner scientist, admin

Thanks, everybody! We've go what we need for now.
More details to come...

Posted February 10, 2014 9:24 PM

When the second opportunity comes, will the conditions for candidates for follow-up observations be the same?

Posted February 11, 2014 4:25 AM

by marckuchner scientist, admin

@artman, not quite. A different part of the sky will be visible.

Posted February 13, 2014 7:47 PM

When the first results of the observation have been revealed, will there be stats to show how many of these candidates turned out to be real stars?

Posted February 13, 2014 9:03 PM

by marckuchner scientist, admin

Gang, I just wrote a blog post about the proposal:
http://blog.diskdetective.org/2014/02/13/our-first-follow-up-observing-proposal/

It might answer your questions, @artman.

Posted February 13, 2014 9:42 PM

Nice information. I've noticed that those objects that are almost definitely stars also include a lot of Mira variables. Any more information on that?

Posted February 13, 2014 10:54 PM

by marckuchner scientist, admin

Great idea for a future post, @artman! Hey--maybe we should start a discussion on blog post ideas.

Posted February 13, 2014 11:39 PM

This might be a good idea.

Posted February 14, 2014 1:47 AM

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00004lv

Let me know Im in

Posted February 14, 2014 9:45 PM

by jacedjohnson

Posted February 27, 2014 8:34 PM

by jacedjohnson

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI00002yh

Posted February 27, 2014 9:04 PM

This is the best candidate I've seen so far for a disk with an inner gap but I don't know if this good candidate is late to the party. It meets the requirements of category 1)

http://talk.diskdetective.org/#/subjects/AWI000046b -- no information in SIMBAD, NOMAD1 1192-0262606 V=13.180 mag, proper motion 0.5mas/yr, SDSS DR10 shows it is clearly a star, SED resembles the example of CoKu Tau 4 (inner gap in circumstellar disk) from the Spitzer examples. RA: 17 05 51.131 DEC: +29 13 21.99

Posted March 4, 2014 5:07 PM